August 25, 2026

5 Common PCB Design Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Image showing a stack of printed circuit boards (PCBs) with a large white 'X' over them, highlighting '5 Common Mistakes in PCB Design.' The background features intricate PCB traces in red and blue on a dark surface, with a purple gradient highlighting the title. The image emphasizes errors commonly made in PCB design, such as layout, signal integrity, and component placement.

PCB design can feel like a race to export the Gerber files and send the board to manufacturing. A quick final review, however, can catch layout and manufacturability issues that would otherwise become expensive delays, rework, or failed prototypes.

In this post, I’ll cover five common PCB design mistakes that can compromise your board and offer practical tips on how to avoid them. More importantly, I’ll show you how Flux, along with its AI assistant, Copilot, can help you catch these issues early and guide you through best practices—keeping your design on track and ready for manufacturing.

Let's dive in.

1. Using the Wrong Trace Width or Spacing

Trace width and spacing are easy to underestimate, especially in high-current or high-speed designs. Traces that are too narrow can overheat or create excessive voltage drop, while inadequate spacing can increase coupling, violate manufacturing limits, or compromise signal integrity.

The width of your trace can be determined by things like; how much current it should carry without overheating or causing excessive voltage drops, Impedance control, and sensitivity of the signal running through it. Our trace width calculator handles the current-carrying case for you, from current, temperature rise and copper thickness.

Flux makes routing high speed signals, such as USB data lines, easier by automatically performing coupled routing of the data lines (D+ and D-) and calculating the impedance of the pair based on the PCB stackup. This helps prevent reflections that can cause signal distortion, timing issues, and data corruption.

Flux Copilot can also help you calculate the appropriate trace width based on the current it needs to carry, while also considering the required impedance for high-speed signals. Just ask something like:

@copilot please recommend trace width for my VBUS.

Then copilot responses:

“For VBUS, typically a 5V supply in USB applications, let's assume a common scenario where you might anticipate a current of up to 1A. Using a temperature rise of 10°C, the general guideline for trace width on a 1 oz/ft² copper PCB is approximately 20-30 mils (0.5-0.8 mm) per amp of current.”

2. Choosing Incorrect Via Sizes

Vias are crucial for connecting different layers in a PCB, but choosing the wrong size or type can cause issues in both signal integrity and manufacturing. Blind, buried, and microvias are often used in high-density interconnect (HDI) boards, but these require careful consideration during design. For instance, microvias are perfect for compact designs, but if placed improperly, they can lead to poor layer transitions or increased inductance.

Flux let’s you set up your stackup where you add all the manufacturer capabilities. When you need some more advice on what stackup best suits your design, always feel free to ask copilot for some ideas, you could ask

@copilot in a table format recommend vias sizes that i can use for my VDD3V3, my USB, and the other signal buses?

Then here's the copilot response,

If you're routing a high-speed differential pair, such as USB or PCIe, through multiple layers, via stubs can cause signal reflections that degrade signal quality. A rule of thumb is to ensure via lengths are minimized, or even better, use back-drilling techniques to remove stubs, especially in high-frequency circuits.

Moreover, not all manufacturers support the same via sizes, so checking with your manufacturer early in the design process can avoid headaches later. Make sure to adhere to their capabilities, including the aspect ratio limits (via depth to diameter), to avoid costly redesigns e.g. 20:1 for PCBWay.

3. Poor Power and Ground Plane Layout

Left: bad example of not using ground fills. Right: Utilizing Flux automatic ground fills

The layout of power and ground planes is another common area where mistakes are made. These planes act as the backbone of your circuit's stability, so a poorly designed plane can introduce noise, increase EMI, and degrade power delivery.

By default, Flux starts you off with a solid, contiguous ground plane since it is critical for minimizing noise and providing a low-impedance return path for high-speed signals. It is advisable to avoid creating islands which can cause severe signal integrity.

Example:
Imagine routing a high-speed signal across a split ground plane. The signal may cross the gap, creating a longer return path, which increases inductance and can lead to signal distortion or timing errors in critical circuits like clocks or data buses.

Similarly, power planes should be wide enough to handle the current required by each section of the circuit. For designs with sensitive analog circuits, it’s often a good idea to have separate power planes or split planes for analog and digital sections to avoid cross-talk and noise coupling.

4. Skipping Design for Manufacturability (DFM)

Designing with manufacturability in mind is essential to ensure that your board can be built without issues. It’s easy to forget that the design rules you use in your ECAD tool may not fully align with your manufacturer’s capabilities, and this can result in delays or additional costs.

Flux provides users with pre-configured templates which align with most of the popular manufacture (e.g. PCBWay, JLCPCB, AISLER, LION Circuits, SEEED Studio and many more) capabilities so that users don’t have to worry about manually configuring things like trace widths, keepout, and other parameters. A good general rule of thumb is to always start new project using Flux manufacturer design rule templates

There are numerous DFM tips but here are some common ones to consider;

  • Don’t Place Parts Too Close to the Edge of the Board
    Many designers overlook the fact that most manufacturers require a certain clearance between the edge of the board and components. This clearance is needed for handling, tooling, and depaneling during assembly. If components like connectors or switches are too close to the edge, you risk damaging them during these processes.
  • Take into Account Manufacturer Capabilities
    Every manufacturer has specific limitations regarding trace width, spacing, via sizes, and the number of layers they can handle. Sending a design that exceeds these capabilities will either increase costs or lead to a failed production run. For example, your HDI board with 0.1mm microvias might not be feasible for a manufacturer specializing in simpler designs.
  • Too Closely Spaced Components
    Placing components too close together can lead to assembly issues, especially for automated pick-and-place machines. Components that are tightly packed can cause soldering problems like bridging, or they may not fit the soldering process at all. Always check for manufacturer’s minimum spacing requirements between components and account for heat sinks or thermal relief pads if necessary.

Using Flux manufacturer design rule templates will alert you when either of the manufacturer capabilities  are violated even before sending your files for manufacturing saving you time.

5. Placing Decoupling Capacitors Incorrectly

Decoupling capacitors are used to filter out noise and provide a stable voltage to ICs, especially in digital circuits where rapid switching causes power fluctuations. However, placing these capacitors too far from the pins of the IC can render them ineffective. It is advisable to place these decoupling capacitors as close as possible to the IC without violating the minimum spacing a manufacturer can work with.

Example:
In a typical microcontroller design, you should place decoupling capacitors (such as 0.1µF and 1µF) as close as possible to the VCC and GND pins. Ideally, the capacitors should be placed on the same layer as the IC to reduce parasitic inductance and ensure faster response times. Failure to do so can cause power integrity issues, leading to glitches or resets in your circuit.

Additionally, use vias sparingly when routing decoupling capacitors. Each via adds inductance to the path, which reduces the capacitor's ability to suppress high-frequency noise.

Final Thoughts

Before pressing that button to send your PCB design for manufacturing, it's worth taking a step back and performing a thorough review of your design. These design review steps can be quite a handful but what we have discussed above can be considered as the bare minimum. Flux manufacturer design rules makes it easy to ensure trace widths, appropriate via sizes, and manufacturer capabilities are considered when designing your board.

A thorough PCB design review can be a very daunting task, you might not be sure where to start or what checks to include in the review process. That is one of the reasons Flux’s AI lives in your project. You can use copilot to quickly check decoupling capacitors, power and grounding, ensuring compliance with industry standards, and even creating a stronger supply chain. To learn more about how you can use this tool, Sign up for Flux today.

Profile avatar of the blog author

Collins Emasi

Collins is an electronics engineer with a certain knack for IoT and human-centric hardware design. Find him on Flux @collinsemasi

Go 10x faster from idea to PCB
Work with Flux like an AI hardware engineer—handling complex tasks, learning your standards, explaining its decisions, and collaborating with you at every step.
Illustration of sub-layout. Several groups of parts and traces hover above a layout.
Design PCBs with AI
Introducing a new way to work: Give Flux a job and it plans, explains, and executes workflows inside a full browser-based eCAD you can edit anytime.
Screenshot of the Flux app showing a PCB in 3D mode with collaborative cursors, a comment thread pinned on the canvas, and live pricing and availability for a part on the board.
Design PCBs with AI
Introducing a new way to work: Give Flux a job and it plans, explains, and executes workflows inside a full browser-based eCAD you can edit anytime.
Screenshot of the Flux app showing a PCB in 3D mode with collaborative cursors, a comment thread pinned on the canvas, and live pricing and availability for a part on the board.
Design PCBs with AI
Introducing a new way to work: Give Flux a job and it plans, explains, and executes workflows inside a full browser-based eCAD you can edit anytime.
Screenshot of the Flux app showing a PCB in 3D mode with collaborative cursors, a comment thread pinned on the canvas, and live pricing and availability for a part on the board.

Related Content

Electronic Component Sourcing: Lead Times & Component Lifecycles

Electronic Component Sourcing: Lead Times & Component Lifecycles

Strategies for sourcing electronic components, managing BOMs, navigating lead times, and planning for component lifecycles to build a resilient hardware supply chain.

Profile avatar of Gabriel Hacohen
Gabriel Hacohen
|August 28, 2026
Design for Manufacturing: How to Move from Prototype to Production

Design for Manufacturing: How to Move from Prototype to Production

A practical guide to Design for Manufacturing (DFM) that helps hardware teams transition from validated prototypes to scalable, production-ready products.

Profile avatar of Gabriel Hacohen
Gabriel Hacohen
|August 26, 2026
Designing for Compliance: PCB Layout Tips for EMI & FCC/CE Testing

Designing for Compliance: PCB Layout Tips for EMI & FCC/CE Testing

Practical PCB layout and design strategies to reduce EMI and improve the chances of passing FCC and CE compliance testing on the first attempt.

Profile avatar of Gabriel Hacohen
Gabriel Hacohen
|August 26, 2026
Hardware Feasibility: Cost Engineering and Part Selection

Hardware Feasibility: Cost Engineering and Part Selection

A guide to evaluating hardware feasibility through requirements definition, component selection, BOM cost estimation, power budgeting, and early manufacturing risk identification.

Profile avatar of Gabriel Hacohen
Gabriel Hacohen
|August 26, 2026
How to Choose the Right Architecture for Robotics, Wearables & IoT

How to Choose the Right Architecture for Robotics, Wearables & IoT

Learn how to choose the right hardware architecture by comparing the unique engineering priorities of robotics, wearables, and IoT products.

Profile avatar of Gabriel Hacohen
Gabriel Hacohen
|August 26, 2026
Hardware Prototyping: From Concept to a Tested PCB

Hardware Prototyping: From Concept to a Tested PCB

A practical guide to hardware prototyping—from breadboard to custom PCB, through structured testing, verification, validation, and iterative revision.

Profile avatar of Gabriel Hacohen
Gabriel Hacohen
|August 26, 2026
Hardware Team Collaboration: ECAD, MCAD & Firmware Workflows

Hardware Team Collaboration: ECAD, MCAD & Firmware Workflows

How electrical, mechanical, and firmware teams can build effective collaboration workflows through design reviews, revision control, and engineering change management.

Profile avatar of Gabriel Hacohen
Gabriel Hacohen
|August 26, 2026
How to Convert PDF Schematics into Editable EDA Files Using AI

How to Convert PDF Schematics into Editable EDA Files Using AI

Step-by-step guide to converting flat PDF schematics into editable PCB/EDA files using an AI-assisted schematic conversion workflow, with validation and export considerations for KiCad and Altium.

Profile avatar of Gabriel Hacohen
Gabriel Hacohen
|August 20, 2026